Galactan's Chaos parties

[dayman]

The next party is in one hour!

On a side note, I've decided to use regular deathmatch for this first one, just so everyone gets to know what it's like.

Which wads (both, or just one) and what time zone and exact time?

[TailsMK4]

The next party is in one hour!

On a side note, I've decided to use regular deathmatch for this first one, just so everyone gets to know what it's like.

I'll probably be doing Roboenza or Saxton Hale since I dislike DM in general, so I'll probably just watch the server whenever I crash or quit.

[Galactan]

The next party is in one hour!

On a side note, I've decided to use regular deathmatch for this first one, just so everyone gets to know what it's like.

Which wads (both, or just one) and what time zone and exact time?

Both wads, 7:00 American Central time.

[dayman]

7 more minutes, then~ Be there in a New York minute~

[Galactan]

Server is down.

[dayman]

Minus a few of the selections, the game was fun. And the message lag. Not too much of other lag, though, for me...

[Galactan]

That went pretty well.
However, due to dayman winning EVERY.  SINGLE.  TIME, I'm enacting a new rule.
If you win 3 times in a row, you must spectate!  No questions asked!  This is mainly to prevent one person from being the chaos master and choosing the same thing over and over and over (why party deaths, dayman?).  It's also to prevent a single person from mercilessly destroying everyone else, ruining the fun.
Failure to comply with this rule will get you banned!

[dayman]

It should be tweaked a bit to like 5 matches in a row.

Also, other people shouldn't get to decide what gimmicks are put in aside from the Machine Master (or whatever it's called), and we should have a ban list of gimmicks.

[Galactan]

Okay, so we have 3 votes for unfair with no posts to back them up.  They will be ignored.
I'm fine with settling for a happy medium of 4, dayman, but 5 is a bit much.
And here's a banlist:

(click to show/hide)

Zombies
Earthquake
Jelly world
x2 damage
explosive deaths
Gutsman G
dim lights
The Gauntlet
and a banned combo:
Party deaths+fall damage

[dayman]

I voted "Needs some tweaking."

[dayman]

Why are "party deaths" and "fall damage" banned as a combo? Shouldn't using Gravity Hold and Falling damage be a banned move or whatever?

[Galactan]

Why are "party deaths" and "fall damage" banned as a combo? Shouldn't using Gravity Hold and Falling damage be a banned move or whatever?

That's a bit harder to enforce than just banning the combo outright.

[Rozark]

-lets out deep sigh-

I suppose I'll do this.
and probably make a complete ass of myself

One cannot simply ban users for winning. That's simply being a sore loser, and noone likes those. If you want him to stop winning, simply beat him. I thought this was a chaos party where everything exists, not "Oh hey, let's throw an AWESOME party but we can't do this, or this, or this, or this, etc"

It'd be better if you would just remove the rule.

[Galactan]

-lets out deep sigh-

I suppose I'll do this.
and probably make a complete ass of myself

One cannot simply ban users for winning. That's simply being a sore loser, and noone likes those. If you want him to stop winning, simply beat him. I thought this was a chaos party where everything exists, not "Oh hey, let's throw an AWESOME party but we can't do this, or this, or this, or this, etc"

It'd be better if you would just remove the rule.

That's the problem: nobody COULD beat him.  If he had lost even once, I'd be perfectly happy.  But because he won 100% of the time, (and usually by a 5 point or more margin), it didn't seem entirely fair to people who wanted to be chaos master.
Having used this as a point of argument, I will adjust the rule to this: You must spectate if you win 5 times in a row by 5 or more points.

[Rozark]

It's still an outrageous rule. How about you just.. not.. have it? Maybe? >_>