Advanced Search

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Ashley

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 20
106
Quote from: "Yellow Devil"
"Being creative" does not mean taking weapons other people had their name down for and then being a dick about it, at the very least you could be a little bit nicer about it. Being egotistical? Selfish? If I was, don't you think I would've released the weapons the second I created them, sort of like... you?

I didn't take anything. That list only applied to those who were interested in doing that project. I'm doing this for myself and the people around the community.
I'm also hardly being a dick about it. You people got steamed when I released a weapon of my own creation Ivory was meant to do (but apparently never did) for your project.

I'm only being "mean" about it because you people keep antagonizing me about the stupidest of things.

Egotistical, perhaps not; childish would be better suited. Selfish, yes. You have that childish, selfish attitude that's crying "Hey, I did it already so you can't!!", like a young child would do. Fighting over something that in the end, will get someone in trouble or hurt, or some stupid action will be taken and someone's left up feeling bad about it.

Me releasing my weapons doesn't make me selfish or egotistical. It means I'm putting something creative out for the masses to have and for myself to improve over based on their opinions.

I'm surprised this topic got to 8 pages of replies, and will probably escalate to at least 10, but 90% of it has been you people fighting with me and others over what has been done and your opinions on why it shouldn't continue. If anything, this topic needs ridden of this horrible flame you needn't continue, or overall deleted [so I can just restart {Though, someone would post about that topic being similar to this one and whine about why it shouldn't exist, or something..}].

Continue arguing all you want, but what remains is that your side is of no value to what I care to read, know, or discuss any further.

As it stands, "I don't give a fuck about what you say; I'm sick of your constant pessimism, and am not dealing with it any longer. Stop it now, or action will [should] be taken."

From this reply on, I hope to see nothing but criticism about the weapons, where and why they should improve or be "nerfed", rather than this senseless flame war that's getting nobody anywhere.

To reiterate: "This community really needs to let off some steam." ~My PM to Mr. X yesterday.

107
(click to show/hide)

Just because you've done it, and don't want me to do it, doesn't mean I can't, YD. Get over that egotistical, selfish way of thinking and let people be creative.

108
I don't care about what I'm called, Mr. X. It's just text most of the time, to me.

If it's honestly truthful then it would probably offend me, but you don't mean it.  ;)

I still have all the PM's, and I'd be willing to post them here, if anyone wants any more herp for their derp.

109
Why do I need to PM you again?

It's my weapon, my sprites, my work.

110
1. I never ASKED him if I could make the weapon. I originally had this as my PM:

Quote from: "Ashley"
viewtopic.php?f=28&t=2087

I'm doing BlackHole Bomb unless you've already done it.

These weapons literally take me an hour, at the most. ._."

I'll keep doing them, too! After BHB is thunder claw.

2. I said I'd do it if he didn't. After he told me to "do weapons that aren't taken", I decided to do it anyways due to the lack of options in weapons I wanted to make. Then all this flame started.

3. I don't care what any of you people think. Hate me if you want, that's your problem. I'm making weapons, and that's that. If you really have an issue with things such as this, you really need to get out more. (Sorry if I'm acting like a bitch, but it's necessary.)

4. @Mr. X - Being mean isn't often intentional, with me.

EDIT:

As far as I know, the Black Hole Bomb doesn't pull players into it... At least, I didn't think it did yet. It'll pull you into it if you're facing away from it and you're getting hit by it.. (Recoil Knockback by it)

111
Updated OP with a more organized pack... Hopefully this keeps the load of downloads down.

112
DECORATE and ACS Modifications / Re: Pokémon Projectile for fun~
« on: February 16, 2011, 08:44:21 PM »
I don't think that's why, Gummy, since it's not technically an enemy. It's just a projectile... But Idk.

I'll probably make this a weapon and see how that fares soon.

113
Quote from: "Myroc"
Quote from: "Ashley"
This was the original plan but then we have to look at things like Roboenza, where small corridors could be camped easily)

I would just like to add something here: Don't design weapons for Roboenza unless it's specifically for that mode and nothing else. Design weapons suitable to deathmatch. Despite how many people prefer the former, the game and its weapons are designed for the latter, and a weapon that sucks in DM and is mediocre in Roboenza is worse than a weapon that's decent in DM and overpowered in Roboenza.

I'm not designing anything for Roboenza. It's being designed for general gameplay. Since this is a future expansion weapon, you have to acknowledge that it will be used in LMS, and therefore will be usable in Roboenza.

As of the moment, this is perfect in any game mode, with the minor bug of pulling players into it being unaffective and affective at random intervals.
If it didn't pull people and projectiles into it, it would be perfect and bug-free (aside from the fact that it doesn't create a vortex on linedefs, because the explosion is bigger than the bomb's first part).


---

Edit:

An idea was passed onto me that the bomb's vortex should grow bigger every few frames.
As of now, the bomb itself is 10 radius and 10 height. The vortex is 40 radius and 40 height.

I would only do this if the bomb's radius and height were 40, that way it would explode near the player, and not explode so they couldn't escape it. This way it'd give them room to move away from it before it grew bigger.

(It would grow to a max of 100r 100h, and after that permanently died. If it couldn't expand in its area of explosion, it would just disappear)

Opinion on if this should be done?

114
Yea.. That's the hard part. (OHKO weapon would be annoying. This was the original plan but then we have to look at things like Roboenza, where small corridors could be camped easily)

An idea I was shot was to give the players in a radius of an explosion when the vortex is made an inventory item that can't be selected, that the vortex tells to move towards.

[Easier terms: The bomb explodes. Vortex is spawned. Players in some radius of it get an item. The vortex pulls any players with this item to it, at a decently strong rate; the shooter would also get this weapon, but doesn't get hurt from the bomb..]

115
Shoots a slow moving undamaging projectile that when hits a player, or the ground, or after the timer expires, explodes into a small vortex that damages whatever's inside it. (Working on making it pull players into it, and to block projectiles that fly into it)

It has 7 charges and does a little over half your health unless you move out of it. (Not such an easy thing to hit with, and not easy to escape from; It's super gravity!)

116
My tone of "I don't need to thank you for you telling me to take your work"?

That was entirely fair.

Sidenote: I have completed the Black Hole Bomb weapon, and I WILL be releasing it here (I know very well that YD has done it).

If you have a problem with me releasing it.. That's your problem and not mine. Keep it off this topic.

117
Quote from: "Mr. X"
Obviously, I don't agree with Ashley, but BradeDude, there isn't a single thing in that post that has any basis in logic and reasoning...except the part about DTD.


Anyways, I'm not so much mad that you released this weapon, but when you antagonize somebody for saying "go ahead and make them", that to me is just pure bull shit.

I'm not antagonizing anyone.. You're antagonizing ME for making it.

It seems to me that this is some huge big deal for you all, and I don't see why.

I vote you guys just back off my case and leave me be, because everything you're saying is of little to no meaning anymore. I'm making weapons my way, whether you like it or not. End of story.

SO, let's keep the flame out of here.

118
Quote from: "Mr. X"
Being silly?  You flat out said you were aware of the other topic, and did it anyways.  That list was there so people would deliberately avoid doing just that.  A "sorry for breaking the rules of that topic/stealing the job you signed up for" would have been nice, but no, instead you're just being a jackass about it.

I'm not being a jackass about anything. You guys are misunderstanding everything, or just overreacting. I know the other topic exists, and I did the weapon because I wanted to. The list of people applies to those who agreed to doing those themselves. I never signed up for that list. I just outright did the weapons.

Again, there is no rule anywhere officially stated by Mike saying that "only one person, and only the person who signs up to do so, may make a specific weapon; any others who do so should take their weapon down from the forums if the other person says to, and if they let the other person(s) take their job and make the weapon themselves, must thank the original person who took the job."

You guys just want me to follow your "topic rules" that don't apply out of that topic, and that's fine. Claiming I stole work is not. I did nothing of the sort, as I made this weapon myself. I don't need permission to make a weapon that somebody else is doing, too.

I never signed up to do anything on that list. I'm just doing them for myself and the people around here who want something different.

Quote from: "BradeDude"
its an issue of respect and copyright, if someones to claims something and another person does it thats a copyright problem, andif they are rude like you and just does it without asking or thanking its an issue of respect, and to finish up this dump i ask that this be locked for 1: we have a thread about 8-10 weapons 2: violates copyright 3: R-E-S-P-E-C-T, find out what it means to cutstuff!

Respect, MAYBE. Copyright, no. There's no copyrights being put on anything here, and especially none on "someone taking a job".

I'm hardly being rude at all here. I'm just defending myself against three or four people whom think I have to do exactly what they say because they're better than me or have jurisdiction over my being and actions.

1. You have a thread about it, aye. That's nice. But I can release my work if I feel like it.
2. There's no copyright.
3. I know what respect means, silly.

Quote from: "Korby"
Not really, but it's the same with skins. "I have one, why would I need the other?"

You may have Ivory's, but not everyone does. And it's just a preference of the people who wants whatever.. Some people may want both just to try them out.

119
That's still not a good reason for me to thank him.

There's no specific rule saying only one person can make that weapon, and if someone claims the job to do it, then somebody else does it first, it's mandatory to thank them for doing it before them.

You guys are just being silly..

Either way, "thank you"?

120
You act as if it's an honor or privilege to "take your work", Ivory...

It's not as if I couldn't have done this with or without your "permission". (And I did do it without such)

There's no justified reason to thank you.

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 20