Messages

151

General Gaming Discussion / Re: Pokemon Discussion thread!

« on: February 15, 2013, 11:09:45 PM »

I can't really figure out what exactly makes Dark type Pokemon...dark. It appears they got different ways.

152

General Gaming Discussion / Re: Pokemon Discussion thread!

« on: February 15, 2013, 08:54:31 PM »

I doubt the Light type is really necessary since Electric/Psychic's been there for those Pokemons that involve light.

Although I don't really want another type if we didn't get a Dark Gym yet.

153

Forum Games Archive / Re: Caption that screenshot! - Week 21

« on: February 15, 2013, 06:21:22 PM »

Gumballtoid, the manager of Hotel Gumballtoid was unable to afford a door for the enterance. So due to problems with the economy, Gumballtoid used Wood Men instead.

154

Forum Games Archive / Re: Defeat something with something else!

« on: February 13, 2013, 11:59:38 PM »

It's not really an image, but this video really says it.

(click to show/hide)

155

General Gaming Discussion / Re: Pokemon Discussion thread!

« on: February 13, 2013, 02:14:48 AM »

Than again. I say that to most of the Pokemon. But not really every.

I don't get why Move Evolution is even necessary. But for stuff like items, my point still sorta stands.


Still Eevee seems to be the first when it comes with a new evolution method, although shared with other Pokemon yes, but I believed mostly in mind for them.
Hence there's a limit of 5 evolutions per Pokemon in the Gen 3 games (And it was 5 evolutions in Gen 3).

156

Anything Goes / Re: Spamthread V.1

« on: February 13, 2013, 12:33:44 AM »

Just kick your feet left/right. Spin around.

And that's dancing. Although, you could just look at this and mimick this.

(click to show/hide)

157

General Gaming Discussion / Re: Pokemon Discussion thread!

« on: February 13, 2013, 12:30:26 AM »

Llama: Llama I don't really like it THAT much...yet.

I actually plan to avoid using Eevee the first time I play this game.


Tango: You DO realize the newer Pokemon's evolutions use a method/item that's introduced in the same generation it came in. Because of that being there, it would make sense for why it wasn't possible before.

The same things can apply to the Baby Pokemon.

158

General Gaming Discussion / Re: CutStuff Zombies. IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT

« on: February 12, 2013, 08:23:19 PM »

I wasn't saying to edit the sprites.

Just study the walking animation.

159

General Gaming Discussion / Re: CutStuff Zombies. IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT

« on: February 12, 2013, 06:20:13 PM »

(click to show/hide)

You could use this for an example maybe.

Although I didn't really made the image, but you can get an idea maybe.

160

Forum Games / Re: Rate the avatar of the user above you

« on: February 12, 2013, 04:26:00 PM »

Because it's supposed to be a Genderbent Megaman.

Anyho.

6/10 The quality and size seems real dull.

161

General Gaming Discussion / Re: Pokemon Discussion thread!

« on: February 12, 2013, 04:21:26 PM »

ASFD
Do we seriously need an 8th evolution?

Nicknaming it, Candyeon. I'm guessing the type could be Fighting or Flying. It resembles normal too.

Please don't tell me if there's a counterpart to this evolution.
I wish I can read Japanese.

162

General Gaming Discussion / Re: CutStuff Zombies. IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT

« on: February 12, 2013, 04:10:19 PM »

Although you shouldn't really get sidetracked with the extra content, thinking about it.

Like how much of the Main Story you finished anyways?

163

Forum Games / Re: Rate the avatar of the user above you

« on: February 12, 2013, 03:51:20 AM »

10/10 Somehow this suits your name.

164

General Gaming Discussion / Re: CutStuff Zombies. IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT

« on: February 12, 2013, 03:48:19 AM »

Thats a relief. I want to see this game get done.

165

Forum Games Archive / Re: Travis' Mafia (NIGHT PHASE #4)

« on: February 12, 2013, 02:11:44 AM »

When you say Smash is being serious. I can't really take him seriously.