Advanced Search

Author Topic: Castlevania (general purpose Castlevania thread)  (Read 8716 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

January 20, 2011, 10:38:56 PM
Reply #15

Offline Disco

  • Standard Member
  • Date Registered: October 27, 2010, 07:35:57 AM

    • View Profile
Re: Castlevania (general purpose Castlevania thread)
« Reply #15 on: January 20, 2011, 10:38:56 PM »
People give Castlevania II a bad rap, but it's one of my favorites.

And it lays the foundation for the "metroidvanias" of the future.

January 20, 2011, 11:48:28 PM
Reply #16

Offline Alucard

  • Standard Member
  • Date Registered: November 10, 2010, 01:20:17 AM

    • View Profile
    • http://www.youtube.com/user/MetalMephiles9000
Re: Castlevania (general purpose Castlevania thread)
« Reply #16 on: January 20, 2011, 11:48:28 PM »
I really like CVII since it actually requires this moronic thing called THINKING! GASP!

September 23, 2011, 01:48:48 AM
Reply #17

Offline Captain Barlowe

  • Warrior

  • hell
  • *
  • Date Registered: December 10, 2010, 03:46:43 AM

    • View Profile
    • ness
Re: Castlevania (general purpose Castlevania thread)
« Reply #17 on: September 23, 2011, 01:48:48 AM »
Ooh, a Castlevania topic.
I started with Rondo of Blood and SoTN (Dracula X Chronicles + 10 dollars due to it used = WIN), and although Rondo was hard (third level raaaagh) it was fun.
SoTN was awesome except for the fact that too many weapons just broke the game in it's entirety. Most people associate the Crissy/Alucard Rod trick forbeing the "nuke" of the game, but there is the lvl 99 sword familiar, the Ring of Varda and most of the alucard armor that just make the game easy. It is one of my favorites, though.

I've recently finished Dawn of Sorrow, now working on the Boss Rush. It's pretty much rates right inbetween Rondo and SoTN for me.Chaos Ring and Iron Golem = Best thing since sliced bread. Oh, and sorry for the bump or something
I have yet to play the classic games, though. I might start playing those later, probably starting with the first one.

September 23, 2011, 01:50:40 AM
Reply #18

Online Korby

  • Global Moderator

  • Benvenuto nella room italiana!
  • *************
  • Date Registered: March 04, 2010, 03:36:02 AM

    • View Profile
    • Korby Games
Re: Castlevania (general purpose Castlevania thread)
« Reply #18 on: September 23, 2011, 01:50:40 AM »
Recently finally played the first one.
Level one was easy, then I got hit in the face by Medusa heads a lot in level three. I stopped playing. I should probably beat it sometime.

September 23, 2011, 10:38:23 AM
Reply #19

Offline CHAOS_FANTAZY

  • MM8BDM Extender

  • Still Around, But Only Kind Of
  • *
  • Date Registered: November 21, 2010, 08:21:24 PM

    • View Profile
Re: Castlevania (general purpose Castlevania thread)
« Reply #19 on: September 23, 2011, 10:38:23 AM »
Quote from: "Korby"
Recently finally played the first one.
Level one was easy, then I got hit in the face by Medusa heads a lot in level three. I stopped playing. I should probably beat it sometime.
For shame, Korby.  I didn't start getting frustrated and ragequit repeatedly 'til level four!

New CastleVanias look rather boring and way too easy to me.  If anyone can prove me wrong about this, I will be pleasantly surprised.

Anyways, I have CVI and CVIII downloaded on my Wii.  I've beaten CastleVania, and I'm at a watery-ruins-type level on CastleVania III.  The glass dragons are ba-aaaaack...and they're annoying as ever.

September 23, 2011, 06:11:17 PM
Reply #20

Online Korby

  • Global Moderator

  • Benvenuto nella room italiana!
  • *************
  • Date Registered: March 04, 2010, 03:36:02 AM

    • View Profile
    • Korby Games
Re: Castlevania (general purpose Castlevania thread)
« Reply #20 on: September 23, 2011, 06:11:17 PM »
It was late and I had better things to do with my time.
Like procrastinate doing homework.

I had also tried Symphony of the Night awhile ago, but I never really liked it.

September 23, 2011, 08:53:20 PM
Reply #21

Offline Alucard

  • Standard Member
  • Date Registered: November 10, 2010, 01:20:17 AM

    • View Profile
    • http://www.youtube.com/user/MetalMephiles9000
Re: Castlevania (general purpose Castlevania thread)
« Reply #21 on: September 23, 2011, 08:53:20 PM »
Quote from: "Korby"
Recently finally played the first one.
Level one was easy, then I got hit in the face by Medusa heads a lot in level three. I stopped playing. I should probably beat it sometime.

I get killed on Level 2. :ugeek: Your argument is invalid.

Quote from: "Disco"
People give Castlevania II a bad rap, but it's one of my favorites.

And it lays the foundation for the "metroidvanias" of the future.

Quoting an old post, yes.

But I find that Castlevania II was also similar to Zelda II.

So why do people hate CV2 so much, but love Zelda 2?

Also:

Quote from: "CHAOS_FANTAZY"
New CastleVanias look rather boring and way too easy to me.  If anyone can prove me wrong about this, I will be pleasantly surprised.

Lords of Shadow is fun, it mixes action with puzzles.

Then again, I am fairly easily pleased with games.

September 23, 2011, 09:36:50 PM
Reply #22

Offline Blaze Yeager

  • MM8BDM Extender

  • Retired, but still kicking.
  • *******
  • Date Registered: March 14, 2010, 01:17:23 AM

    • View Profile
Re: Castlevania (general purpose Castlevania thread)
« Reply #22 on: September 23, 2011, 09:36:50 PM »
i'm hoping konami does a CV 3DS game.

September 24, 2011, 02:04:17 AM
Reply #23

Offline Captain Barlowe

  • Warrior

  • hell
  • *
  • Date Registered: December 10, 2010, 03:46:43 AM

    • View Profile
    • ness
Re: Castlevania (general purpose Castlevania thread)
« Reply #23 on: September 24, 2011, 02:04:17 AM »
OH MAN
Just got an Iron Golem soul... again (that makes two!). And I wasn't even trying to get it, either (ex: no Ghost dancer equipped, no Soul Eater Ring equipped, didn't farm it like a dairy farmer, etc)

I hated getting that soul on my first try. Kinda hilarious that it pops out of nowhere when I wasn't trying to get it... (last time took me about 90 kills)

October 26, 2011, 07:41:08 PM
Reply #24

Offline OZX

  • Standard Member
  • Date Registered: March 03, 2011, 11:26:26 PM

    • View Profile
Re: Castlevania (general purpose Castlevania thread)
« Reply #24 on: October 26, 2011, 07:41:08 PM »
*removed due the damn suckyness*

>_>

October 26, 2011, 11:57:34 PM
Reply #25

Offline LlamaHombre

  • MM8BDM Extender
  • ***********
  • Date Registered: November 15, 2010, 09:19:04 PM

    • View Profile
    • My Famitracker Covers
Re: Castlevania (general purpose Castlevania thread)
« Reply #25 on: October 26, 2011, 11:57:34 PM »
Sorry to say this, but the intro stopped me from watching any of the actual video.

October 27, 2011, 12:02:02 AM
Reply #26

Offline OZX

  • Standard Member
  • Date Registered: March 03, 2011, 11:26:26 PM

    • View Profile
Re: Castlevania (general purpose Castlevania thread)
« Reply #26 on: October 27, 2011, 12:02:02 AM »
Sorry for the loudand failing music. you can skip tp 0:57 to skip loud music lawl.

October 27, 2011, 12:02:37 AM
Reply #27

Offline LlamaHombre

  • MM8BDM Extender
  • ***********
  • Date Registered: November 15, 2010, 09:19:04 PM

    • View Profile
    • My Famitracker Covers
Re: Castlevania (general purpose Castlevania thread)
« Reply #27 on: October 27, 2011, 12:02:37 AM »
It wasn't the music, let me assure you that.

October 27, 2011, 12:03:36 AM
Reply #28

Offline OZX

  • Standard Member
  • Date Registered: March 03, 2011, 11:26:26 PM

    • View Profile
Re: Castlevania (general purpose Castlevania thread)
« Reply #28 on: October 27, 2011, 12:03:36 AM »
Quote from: "LlamaHombre"
It wasn't the music, let me assure you that.

the quotes?FFF-i faild. ;.;

October 27, 2011, 12:04:25 AM
Reply #29

Offline LlamaHombre

  • MM8BDM Extender
  • ***********
  • Date Registered: November 15, 2010, 09:19:04 PM

    • View Profile
    • My Famitracker Covers
Re: Castlevania (general purpose Castlevania thread)
« Reply #29 on: October 27, 2011, 12:04:25 AM »
It was the poor grammar and the irrelevance to Castlevania in its intirety that turned me off.